A couple of months
ago, a friend messaged me on Facebook, asking me for a recommendation on which
film he should see on the big screen for the weekend. Browsing the showtimes
for local theaters, I told him to avoid Taken
3 at all costs (the big release for that Friday, and, let's face it, a
ripoff of The Fugitive, with bigger
explosions and less logic) and heartily recommended The Imitation Game instead, starting Benedict Cumberbatch and Keira
Knightley. "Oh, yeah," my friend wrote back, "[that] reminded me
of A Beautiful Mind a little. I'm
sure it's very different, but the decrypting idea was similar."
Immediately I jumped
to the new movie's defense. "Except the encryption stuff in The Imitation Game actually
happened," I snapped, and instantly regretted it. First of all, who was I
to say that the film shouldn't remind him of A Beautiful Mind? Both are period pieces. They're both shot in the
same drab monochromatic browns. Both feature eccentric actors at the height of
their star power. And yes, if you watch the trailers for both, they each seem
to center around code-breaking and high-stakes government intrigue. But the
simpler truth is that Biopics have always been known for futzing the truth when
it comes to their larger-than-life historical subjects. What makes The Imitation Game any different? Though
the film doesn't shy away from the fact that Alan Turing was homosexual, the
events leading up to his arrest for "gross indecency" in 1952 Britain
(among other things) differ greatly from how they're presented on-screen.
Details about the codebreakers' work ethic have been glossed over, characters
have been left out completely or invented for dramatic purposes, and it's even
suggested that Turing suffered from Asperger Syndrome (he didn't) to make his
actions seem more heroic. And yet we're meant to accept all this as gospel
truth!